A.M. Mohan Vs State Represented by SHO and Another (Supreme Court of India)
Case ke facts
Yeh case ek land seller ke against cheating case tha. Complaint lagayi gayi ki usne buyer ko galat fahmi mein paisa kara diya tha. Par aisa koi evidence nahi mila ki land seller ne buyer ko dhokha dene ki niyat se induce kiya ho.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya sirf property bechne par cheating ka case banta hai jab tuk dishonest inducement na mile?
Faisla (Held)
Supreme Court ne FIR aur chargesheet radd kar di. Court ne bola joh bhi Section 415/420 IPC mein cheating hai usme sabse important hai 'dishonest inducement', jo is case mein nahi tha.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap property bech rahe ho aur koi criminal complaint cheating ki without aapke dishonest intention ke, to Supreme Court se relief mil sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeROC aur company complianceAur Companies Act faisle
- Bhuvan Kumar Gupta Vs Maverick Developers and Colonisers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi)NCLAT Delhi · Section 9 (IBC)
- Vijay Kumar Singhania Vs Bank of Baroda and Anr (Supreme Court of India)Supreme Court · Section 7 (IBC)
- Dickey Special Situation Investment Trust-DSSF Series 2 Vs Manish Agarwal (NCLAT Delhi)NCLAT Delhi
- Pinarayi Vijayan Vs K M Shajahan & Ors. (Supreme Court)Supreme Court
- Nurani Subramanian Suryanarayanan Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors. (NCLAT Chennai)NCLAT Chennai · Section 36(4)(a)(i) of IBC
- Datta s/o Sakharam Kothule Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)Bombay High Court
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-30.