Abdul Rahim Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Case ke facts
Is case mein income estimate kar ke 5% mana gaya tha aur us par concealment ki penalty lagayi gayi thi.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya estimated income par Section 271(1)(c) ki penalty lag sakti hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne penalty hata di. Sif estimation se concealment prove nahi hoti.
Practical takeaway
Agar sirf estimate se penalty lagi hai toh strong ground hai appeal jeetne ka.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Amity Land Developers Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Surat)ITAT Surat · Section 50C
- Krinal Gems Vs Income Tax Unit (ITAT Surat)ITAT Surat
- Govardhan Deepchand Bhambhani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur
- ITO Vs Varda Energy and Engineering (ITAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur
- Kallu Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur
- Pranav Kirit Inamdar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-11-03.