Amarjeet Singh Bhatia Vs ACIT-3(1) (ITAT Raipur)
Case ke facts
Amarjeet Singh Bhatia ka case me Rs.21.49 lakh ki reassessment DCIT/ACIT ne ki thi. Lekin CBDT instructions ke hisab se unke paas jurisdiction nahi tha.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bina proper pecuniary jurisdiction ke assessment valid hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne reassessment quash kar di. Bola DCIT/ACIT ke paas itni amount ka power nahi tha CBDT ke rules ke hisaab se.
Practical takeaway
Aapka case jis officer ke pass hai uski monetary limit check kar lo. Jurisdiction ka objection uthaoge to pura case khatam ho sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Aditya Plastic Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)ITAT Rajkot · Section 151, Section 271(1)(b)
- Biophore India Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 263, Section 14A
- ITO Vs NSL Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 14A
- Sanjay Kalsi Vs Central Circle-04 (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271DA
- Sharda Jain Vs PCIT-1 (Chhattisgarh High Court)Chhattisgarh High Court · Section 148A(d), Section 148
- AEON Formulations Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-15.