Amigo Finstock Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Case ke facts
Company ne bank ke through loan repay kiya. Department ne Section 147 mein reopening ki aur cash exchange ka doubt dikhake bogus loan addition ki.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bank channel repayment ke bawajood bogus loan addition ho sakti hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne reopening ko to thik maana lekin bank channel clear hone par addition hata di, bola evidence nahi mila cash exchange ka.
Practical takeaway
Agar loan genuine hai aur saara repayment bank ke through hai, to cash ki entry na ho to addition radd ho sakti hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-19.