Amit Shantaram Bagade Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Case ke facts
Assessee pe ₹62 lakh ka addition hua, bolke usne property deal mein on-money liya. Department ne bas kisi teesre aadmi ke statement aur ek Excel file dikhayi. Or koi solid proof nahi diya.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya sirf teesre party ke statement aur Excel entry pe addition justify hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition hata diya. Bola, bina dusre proof ke sirf yeh evidence kaafi nahi hai.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap pe koi addition ho to check karo proof kya diya gaya hai. Sirf teesre aadmi ki baat aur kaghzi entry se addition nahi ho sakta.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-10.