Ankit Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Case ke facts
Ankit Kumar ne ek property kharidi thi. AO ne pooch liya ki paisa kahan se aaya, aur Section 69 (unexplained investment) laga diya. Baad mein AO ne khud check kiya toh paise ka source mil gaya.
Mudda (Issue)
Sec 69 addition tab justify hai jab source explain nahi ho.
Faisla (Held)
Court ne bola jab AO ko source mil gaya toh addition rakhne ka koi reason nahi hai. Isliye ₹7.77 lakh ka Section 69 addition hata diya.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap investment ka source verify karwa pao toh Section 69 ka case nahi banta. Documents ready rakho jo paise ke flow ko validate kar sake.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-17.