Ashok Ramanlal Tamboli Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Case ke facts
Ek vyakti par 31.95 lakh ka penalty Section 271D mein lagi thi, kyunki usne cash loan liya tha. Par co-sharer ko pehle relief mil chuka tha same transaction mein.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya jab co-sharer ko relief mil chuka hai, doosre par bhi penalty tikti hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne dekha ki co-sharer ko already relief mil chuki hai, aur taxpayer ka explanation bhi reasonable tha. Penalty hata di.
Practical takeaway
Agar ek hi transaction mein kisi aur ko relief mil gaya ho, to apne case mein woh order jarur lagao. Department ko pehle ki order dikhana faida de sakta hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-28.