DCIT Vs Hitesh S. Mehta (ITAT Mumbai)
Case ke facts
Yahaan Revenue ne unexplained share investment aur bank deposit pe addition kari thi. Assessee ne ₹2.77 crore interest expense claim kiya tha.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya unexplained investment add ho sakti hai aur kya interest expense allow hoga?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne sari unexplained investment aur deposit wali addition hata di. ₹2.77 crore ka interest expense bhi allow kar diya. Revenue ki appeal fail ho gayi.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap ke investment transactions genuine hain aur records dikh gaye, toh addition hata di jayegi. Interest claim bhi sahi ho toh mil sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Adama India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad
- Balakrishna Venkapppa Bhandary Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 56(2)(x) (gifts/under-value asset transfer)
- Henkel Chembond Surface Technologies Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
- Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Limited Vs ACIT Sitapur/CPC (ITAT Lucknow)ITAT Lucknow · Section 80P (Deduction to co-op societies)
- Yanfeng India Automotive Interior Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Joint CIT (OSD) (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad
- ITO Vs Sumitra Rajeshbhai Jain (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-22.