Dineshbhai Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Case ke facts
Dineshbhai Parmar ne property mein ₹1.82 lakh invest kiye. Department ne poocha paisa kahan se aaya. Assessee ne bola purani savings se kiya hai.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya property investment mein jo paisa laga wo unexplained income hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition hata diya. Bola ki chhoti amount hai, purani savings se aana normal hai.
Practical takeaway
Agar investment ka source normal household savings ho aur amount chhota ho, to records dikhana kaafi hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Chandraprabhu Digamber Jain Mandir Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 12AB
- Olympus Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 144C
- State Bank of India Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai · Section 201/201(1A)
- Trimble Information Technologies India Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
- Abhishek Jayraj Karnani Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 270A
- DCIT Vs Artline Vinimay Private Limited (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-06.