ITO Vs Iddaiah Varikuppala (ITAT Hyderabad)
Case ke facts
Yahaan cash deposit addition aur penalty Section 271(1)(c) par baat ho rahi thi. Department ne cash deposits ko taxable maana tha aur penalty lagayi thi par lower authority ne ye sab hata diya tha.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya cash deposit addition aur penalty sahi thi ya nahi?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne Revenue ki appeal dismiss kar di. Addition aur penalty dono hata di gayi, toh assessee ko relief mil gaya.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap par cash deposit ka addition ya penalty lage, to ache se batao paise ka source legit hai. Agar proof ho to ITAT tak relief mil sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-24.