Jeeten Jayshukhlal Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai Bench)
Case ke facts
Jeeten Jayshukhlal Mehta ka Mumbai ITAT mein case tha. Department ne Section 69A ke andar 27.39 lakh ka addition kiya tha, lekin assessee ne third-party ledger reconcile kar diya.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya Section 69A ki addition justified thi jab explanation mil gaya?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne Section 69A ki addition hata di kyunki ledger se sab match ho gaya. Lekin ₹4.45 lakh ki travel expense ka koi proper proof nahi tha, toh wo disallow kar diya.
Practical takeaway
Jab bhi cash ya deposits pe addition ho to third party ledger ya statements collect kar lo. Travel expenses ka actual document zarur sambhal ke rakho, warna wo disallow ho sakta hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-30.