Kaizen Motoventures Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Case ke facts
Kaizen Motoventures Private Limited ka case tha. Department ne unko Section 148A(b) ka notice diya, par reply dene ke liye sirf 6 clear din diye.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya 6 din ka notice dena sahi hai jab kanoon 7 din bolta hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne bola minimum 7 clear din milne chahiye reply ke liye. 6 din diye, isliye reassessment ki poori karwai radd kar di.
Practical takeaway
Agar Section 148A(b) ka notice aaye, to reply ke liye kam se kam 7 clear din milne chahiye. Kam din diye to appeal pakka banega.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Ajay Singh Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur · Section 153C - Dusre ke case se document milne par assessment
- AVO Carbon India Private Limited Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
- Chowaram Dhiwar Vs ITO (TAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur · Section 148 - Reopening notice
- Dilip N. Thakkar HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 271(1)(c) - Galat income disclose par penalty
- Vijay Baburao Patil Gurav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)ITAT Pune · Section 69A - Income jo books me nahi milti
- ACIT Vs Dignesh Pramukhlal Patel (Supreme Court of India)Supreme Court of India · Section 148
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-20.