Kamaljeet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Case ke facts
Kamaljeet Singh par ₹32.40 lakh penalty Section 270A mein lagayi gayi. Department ki notice mein clear nahi tha ki galti under-reporting hai ya misreporting.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya vague notice par Section 270A penalty lag sakti hai jab exact charge nahi likha?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT Chandigarh ne penalty ko radd kiya, kyunki notice mein kis base par penalty lagani hai wo clear nahi tha.
Practical takeaway
Penalty notice aane par dekho ki notice mein clear likha hai ya nahi - under-reporting ya misreporting. Vague notice aayi to challenge karo.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- DCIT Vs Growmore Research & Assets Management Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 148
- Deepika A Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
- DivyaLok Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271D
- ITO Vs Shashi Kant Tulsian (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur · Section 87A, Section 111A
- Smt. Seema Daga Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur · Section 148
- Bhimji Bhikhabhai Tukadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)ITAT Rajkot
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-08.