Krishna Kant Thakur Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
Case ke facts
Yeh case government ke work contract ka tha. Department ne bina pura evidence dekhe service tax demand laga di thi. Baad mein kuch nayi papers aaye jo record pe nahi the.
Mudda (Issue)
Jab nayi evidence aaye toh kya purani demand valid hai?
Faisla (Held)
Court ne service tax demand wapas bhej di fresh review ke liye. Saare nayi papers dekhkar dobara faisla karne ka order diya.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapke case mein nayi document ya record hai, toh usko submit karo. Court wapas department ko nayi review ke liye bhej sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeTax aur legal helpAur Other faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-21.