Krunal Bharat Bhavsar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Case ke facts
Krunal Bharat Bhavsar ki car ki purchase pe department ne ₹6.35 lakh unexplained investment add kar diya. Dealer ne bataya ki paisa customer funds se hi diya gaya aur margin sirf ₹25,000 thi.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya customer ke paise se payment karne par Section 69 addition lag sakta hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition hata diya. Bola dealer ne apni earning aur transaction ki details clear dikha di thi.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap car dealer ho, to customer ka paisa, margin aur payment ki full trail bank statement aur bill se dikha pao. Tabhi Section 69 ka addition nahi lagega.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- KLSR Infratech Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 69A, Section 69C, Section 80IA
- Lakhmanbhai Maru Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · TDS
- Neelam Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)ITAT Agra · Section 69, Section 56(2)(x)
- Pooja Swami Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Agra)ITAT Agra · Section 250(6)
- Skill Promoters Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 271(1)(c), Section 270A, Section 271AAB
- Yogeshkumar Kasturji Prapapati Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 148, Section 149
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-04.