Mitesh Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad Bench)
Case ke facts
Mitesh Shah ka case tha. Department ne bogus purchases ko Section 69C me daalne ki koshish ki, taki Section 115BBE ka higher tax rate lag sake.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bogus purchases, jo ke business expenses hai, Section 69C se treat kiye ja sakte hain?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne bola ki bogus purchases sirf Section 37 se hi disallow ho sakte hain. Sirf isliye ki zyada tax rate lag jaye, section 69C nahin lagaya ja sakta.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapke purchases genuine nahi lagte to department unhe high tax wali unexplained income me shift nahi kar sakta, jab tak wo actual business expenses hi hain.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-30.