Neelam Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Case ke facts
Neelam Singh ek teacher hai. Department ne property purchase mein unki savings aur Khadar land ki condition par doubt uthaya. Section 69 (jo unexplained investment pe lagta hai) aur Section 56(2)(x) (gift/value pe tax) ke additions kiye gaye.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya property additions sahi hain jab taxpayer ki savings aur land ki quality ki verification pending hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne case wapas AO ko bhej diya. Kaha teacher ki savings aur Khadar land ki asli condition ka proper verification ho.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap land ya property purchase justify kar rahe hain, to apne saving sources aur property ki real condition ki saari details ready rakho. Assessment mein yeh documents maange ja sakte hain.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- KLSR Infratech Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 69A, Section 69C, Section 80IA
- Krunal Bharat Bhavsar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 69
- Lakhmanbhai Maru Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · TDS
- Pooja Swami Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Agra)ITAT Agra · Section 250(6)
- Skill Promoters Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 271(1)(c), Section 270A, Section 271AAB
- Yogeshkumar Kasturji Prapapati Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 148, Section 149
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-04.