Pooja Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Case ke facts
Pooja Agarwal ka case tha. Uske khilaf Rs. 3.70 crore ki addition section 69A ke tahat ki gayi thi cash handling ke basis par.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya cash handler ke khilaf section 69A ki addition sahi thi?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition hata di. Lagta hai court ko justification theek nahi laga.
Practical takeaway
Cash ke source ka proof sahi hai to section 69A ki addition delete ho sakti hai. Jab bhi cash transaction ho, sari entry aur receipts sambhal kar rakho.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- DCIT Vs Prakash Chandra (ITAT Indore)ITAT Indore · Section 68 (unexplained cash credits)
- DCIT Vs Zen Matrix Private Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad
- ISGEC Heavy Engineering Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)ITAT Chandigarh · Section 271(1)(c) (penalty for concealment) aur Section 14A (expenditure on exempt income)
- Rajlaxmi Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)ITAT Pune
- Ashutosh Bhargava Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur
- DCIT Vs Skyway Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-11-07.