Pooja Swami Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Agra)
Case ke facts
Pooja Swami par ₹29.34 crore ka Bitcoin aur bank credit addition lag gaya. CIT(A) ne reasoned order nahi diya, seedha addition confirm kar diya.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bina speaking order ke aise badi amount ka addition sahi hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne case wapas bheja. Bola ki CIT(A) ko reason ke saath proper speaking order pass karna chahiye tha.
Practical takeaway
Aapke case ka order reasoned ho - har important addition pe CIT(A) ya AO ko reason likhna zaruri hai. Agar nahi hai to aap challenge kar sakte ho.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- KLSR Infratech Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 69A, Section 69C, Section 80IA
- Krunal Bharat Bhavsar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 69
- Lakhmanbhai Maru Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · TDS
- Neelam Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)ITAT Agra · Section 69, Section 56(2)(x)
- Skill Promoters Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 271(1)(c), Section 270A, Section 271AAB
- Yogeshkumar Kasturji Prapapati Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 148, Section 149
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-04.