Praveen Khurana Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Case ke facts
Ye case Praveen Khurana ka tha. Assessing Officer ne purane assessment ko wapas khol diya, sirf investigation ya verification ke liye. Unhone kaha capital loss aur US travel expenses par further jaanch chahiye.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya purane assessment ko sirf verification ya shak ki wajah se dobara khol sakte hain?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne reassessment radd kar diya. Unhone bola, assessment wapas kholne ki wajah sirf verification thi, koi concrete evidence nahi tha.
Practical takeaway
Agar AO bas shak pe ya sirf verification ki baat likh ke notice bheje, toh aap reassessment ko challenge kar sakte hain.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Aananda Devcon Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur · Section 143(2)
- DCIT Vs L. Javerchand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)ITAT Bangalore · Section 270A
- Sharekhan Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 14A
- Tata Steel Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
- Agarwal Metcom Private Limited Vs ACIT/DCIT (ITAT Ranchi)ITAT Ranchi
- Cyqurex Systems Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 270A
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-13.