Puneet Batra Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Case ke facts
Advocate Puneet Batra ke premises par CGST search hua. Search ke dauran, client ki confidential details bhi thi.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya advocate ke office ki search legal hai aur client privilege maintain kiya jaa sakta hai?
Faisla (Held)
Court ne search ko sahi mana, par authority ko bola privilege data ya unrelated documents ko protect karna hoga.
Practical takeaway
Agar office par search ho to immediately client privilege documents ki list de do. Officers ko batana hoga ki kaunse papers privileged hain.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeGST notice ka jawabAur GST faisle
- Ganesh Valmik Bawane Vs Joint Director (Bombay High Court)Bombay High Court
- Hind Maha Mineral LLP Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)Bombay High Court · Section 75(4), Section 74A(8)(ii)
- Infosys BPM Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Telangana High Court)Telangana High Court
- Anita Packaging Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Telangana High Court)Telangana High Court · 73 (GST)
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-20.