Rajeshkumar Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Case ke facts
Rajeshkumar Shah ka case money-transfer business ka tha. Cash addition 2.49 lakh ka hua, lekin unhone customer details provide kar diye the.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya jab pura customer detail de diya hai to cash addition sahi hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT Surat ne bola jab customer ka detail mil gaya hai to Section 68 ki addition radd kar di.
Practical takeaway
Money-transfer ya cash business me customer details, bank entry aur receipt sab record rakhna chahiye, taki cash credit ko explain kiya ja sake.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Aditya Plastic Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)ITAT Rajkot · Section 151, Section 271(1)(b)
- Biophore India Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 263, Section 14A
- ITO Vs NSL Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 14A
- Sanjay Kalsi Vs Central Circle-04 (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271DA
- Sharda Jain Vs PCIT-1 (Chhattisgarh High Court)Chhattisgarh High Court · Section 148A(d), Section 148
- AEON Formulations Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-14.