Ritu Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Case ke facts
Ritu Agarwal ka case tha. Tax officer ne penalty lagayi Section 271(1)(c) mein, par notice aur order mein alag alag charge likh diya. Penalty isi confusion pe based thi.
Mudda (Issue)
Jab notice aur order mein alag alag reason ho penalty ka, to penalty valid hai ya nahi?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne penalty radd kar di. Bola, agar notice aur order mein mismatch ho jaye toh assessee ko clear nahi pata ki uspar kya ilzam hai.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapko penalty ka notice aaye aur usme aur order mein alag-alag reason likha ho, toh is point ko appeal mein utha sakte hain.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Aegis Customer Support Services Pvt Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
- Mahaveer Jeerawala Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur)ITAT Jodhpur · Section 153A - Assessment after Search
- Vikas Jain Vs DC Central Circle-2 (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai
- Girdharlal Brothers Vs ACIT/JCIT/DCIT/ACIT/ITO (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 50C
- Khathu Shyam Jangid Brahman Dharamshala Vs ITO (E) (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 12AA
- Shree Madhi Vibhag Khand Udyog Sahakari Mandli Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)ITAT Surat · Section 263
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-11-05.