Sarang Avinash Kamtekar Vs ITO
Mudda (Issue)
CIT(A) ne additional evidence allow kiya lekin AO ki report ka intezaar nahi kiya, seedha order pass kar diya.
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition restore kar diya, keh diya ki AO ki remand report ke bina order nahi pass ho sakta jab naye evidence aaye.
Practical takeaway
Agar case mein naya evidence adduce karo to AO ki remand report zarur aani chahiye, bina uske order galat maana ja sakta hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-21.