Shukla Bholanath Rajpati Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Case ke facts
Shukla Bholanath Rajpati ka case tha. Disputed addition Rs.35.81 crore ki thi. Pehle baar-baar non-compliance hua, fir bhi ek mauka aur diya.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya repeated non-compliance ke bawajood assessee ko ek aur chance milna chahiye?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition ki assessment file wapas department ko bhej di taaki fresh decision ho. Saath hi, Rs.1 lakh ki cost bhi lagayi assessee pe. Final mauka diya jo bhi compliance baaki hai, wo pura karein.
Practical takeaway
Agar aap baar-baar attendance miss karte hain to bhi ek mauka mil sakta hai, par penalty lag sakti hai. Har notice mein timely reply karna zaruri hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Aditya Plastic Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)ITAT Rajkot · Section 151, Section 271(1)(b)
- Biophore India Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 263, Section 14A
- ITO Vs NSL Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)ITAT Hyderabad · Section 14A
- Sanjay Kalsi Vs Central Circle-04 (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271DA
- Sharda Jain Vs PCIT-1 (Chhattisgarh High Court)Chhattisgarh High Court · Section 148A(d), Section 148
- AEON Formulations Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-15.