Smt. Jayanthi Seeman Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Case ke facts
Assessee ke kuch cash deposits aur agricultural income ko AO ne add kar diya tha. Interest claim bhi tha. Section 54 ki verification ke liye kuch issue tha.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya cash deposit aur agricultural income additions valid hain, aur interest claim allowed hai ya nahi?
Faisla (Held)
Court ne kuch additions hata diye, business interest allow kar diya, aur Section 54 wale matter ko wapas AO ko verification ke liye bhej diya.
Practical takeaway
Cash/jamaat aur agriculture income dikhate waqt sabhi papers sahi rakho. Section 54 claim ka proof bhi proper tayar raho kyunki kabhi kabhi AO dubara check ke liye bol sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-02.