Sonali Sonu Sood Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Case ke facts
Sonali Sood par Rs. 76 lakh loan addition ho gayi. Department ne addition kiya bina cross-examination diye. Section 148 jurisdiction bhi dispute pe tha.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bina cross-examination add ki gayi loan amount valid hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne addition AO ko wapas bhej di taaki cross-examination aur inquiry ho sake. Section 148 ke mamle khule chhode.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapke khilaaf bina poori inquiry ya cross-examination ke addition ho jaye to aap ITAT mein remand ki demand kar sakte hain. Documents aur evidence dikhana zaroori hai.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Brij Bihari Kaushik Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 69A (unexplained money), Purchases
- Coimbatore Pioneer Trading & Warehousing Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai · Section 50C (property sale deemed valuation)
- Fine Arts Society Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) 1-2 & Ors. (Bombay High Court)Bombay High Court · Section 148 (income tax reassessment notice)
- RNT Metals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 148 (income tax reassessment notice)
- Bannari Amman Educational Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
- Comtrade Commodities Services Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 263
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-03.