Suresh Chand Goyal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Case ke facts
Search me Suresh Chand Goyal ke group se Rs 3.69 crore cash mila. Department ne section 69A ki addition propose ki. Magar record se cash-in-hand justify ho gaya.
Mudda (Issue)
Agar company ka record cash-in-hand justify karta hai to kya section 69A ki addition valid hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne bola, group ke official record se cash-in-hand justify ho rahi thi, isliye section 69A ki addition radd kar di.
Practical takeaway
Agar search me cash mile to apni books aur group cash records ready rakho. Incomplete ya adhoore tally data par addition ho to usko challenge karo.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Azure Power Uranus Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 263, Section 270A
- Bestone Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Kalpana Misra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi
- Param Dairy Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 271AAB
- Sh. Jagjeet Singh Vs DCIT ACIT (ITAT Amritsar)ITAT Amritsar · Section 263
- Veena Chadha Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 54
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-09-04.