Tushar Jayantibhai Thakkar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Case ke facts
Taxpayer par ₹13.53 lakh Section 69A addition lagayi gayi. Taxpayer ne bank statements, ledger aur company ka confirmation diya. Sab documents sahi paaye gaye.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya jab genuine documents diye gaye hain, tab bhi Section 69A addition justified hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne decide kiya ki bank statements, ledger aur confirmation sufficient evidence hai. Addition hata di.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapke khilaaf unexplained money ka case ho, toh turant apne bank statement, ledger entry aur company ka confirmation letter present karo.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Deepak Kanubhai Bhatt Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Surat)ITAT Surat · Section 270A
- ITO Vs Mahima Sahu (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur
- Shantilal Mafaji Kachchhava Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 69C
- Anand NVH Products Private Limited Vs National E Assessment Centre Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court)Delhi High Court · Section 144C
- Nascent Info Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 270A(9)
- Raysinh Atabhai Vala Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad · Section 10(10B)
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-28.