Umesh Kumar Vs Narendra Kumar Sharma (NCLAT Delhi)
Case ke facts
Umesh Kumar ne Rs.1.90 crore ka claim daala CIRP mein. Resolution Professional ne extra proof maanga, aur proper evidence na hone par claim reject kiya.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya Resolution Professional (RP) claim verify karte waqt extra documents maang sakta hai?
Faisla (Held)
Court ne RP ka action sahi maana. RP aur evidence maang sakta hai, par contract ki legality nahi decide kar sakta.
Practical takeaway
Jo bhi claim file karein, uske support mein pura proof/outstanding documents ready rakhein. RP verification mein detail check karega.
Original report: TaxGuru
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeROC aur company complianceAur Companies Act faisle
- State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs Raj Kumar & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)Supreme Court of India
- Keshav Kumar Nachani Vs Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi)NCLAT Delhi · IBC appeal limitation
- Sandeep S. Ghandat & Ors. Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)Supreme Court of India · Section 36AAA (ye power RBI ko deta hai ki co-operative banks ka board hata sakta hai)
- Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt Ltd Vs Sahjun Impex Trading Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court)Bombay High Court
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-08-26.