Vijay Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Agra)
Case ke facts
Vijay Agarwal ke case mein ITAT ne jewellery kazyada addition hata diya par ₹20 lakh cash ka addition banaya rakha. Soni Jewellers ki valuation ki baat wapas department ko verify karne bhej di.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya jewellery addition ke saath cash addition bhi justify tha?
Faisla (Held)
Jewellery addition hata diya, ₹20 lakh cash addition confirm kiya aur kuch points department ko wapas jaane diye verification ke liye.
Practical takeaway
Agar aapke against cash ya jewellery ka addition ho, to proof aur valuation paper clear rakkho. Verification ka mauka mil sakta hai.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Bhimji Bhikhabhai Tukadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)ITAT Rajkot
- ITO Vs Daljeet Singh (ITAT Chandigarh)ITAT Chandigarh · Section 69
- Styrenix Performance Materials Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad
- Chandraprabhu Digamber Jain Mandir Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 12AB
- Dineshbhai Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)ITAT Ahmedabad
- Olympus Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)ITAT Delhi · Section 144C
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-07.