Vijay Baburao Patil Gurav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Case ke facts
Vijay Baburao Patil Gurav par ₹2.24 lakh ka addition hua tha, kehte hue ki plot payment extra hui. Par iske koi document ya statement nahi diye.
Mudda (Issue)
Kya bina document ke Section 69A ka addition sahi hai?
Faisla (Held)
ITAT ne bola ki jab tak koi proof nahi hai, addition nahi ho sakta. Addition delete kar diya.
Practical takeaway
Section 69A me addition karte waqt department ko proper document dena hoga. Sirf shak par addition nahi chalega.
Original report: taxguru.in
Aapke case mein bhi aisa hi mudda hai?
CGA ki team notice, appeal aur department proceedings mein kaam karti hai. Documents ke saath baat kariye.
WhatsApp par poochiyeIncome tax notice ka jawabAur Income Tax faisle
- Ajay Singh Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)ITAT Jaipur · Section 153C - Dusre ke case se document milne par assessment
- AVO Carbon India Private Limited Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Chennai)ITAT Chennai
- Chowaram Dhiwar Vs ITO (TAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur · Section 148 - Reopening notice
- Dilip N. Thakkar HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)ITAT Mumbai · Section 271(1)(c) - Galat income disclose par penalty
- Kaizen Motoventures Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)ITAT Raipur · Section 148A(b) - Reopening ke notice mein 7 din ka mauka dena hota hai
- ACIT Vs Dignesh Pramukhlal Patel (Supreme Court of India)Supreme Court of India · Section 148
Yeh summary public report par aadhaarit general jaankari hai, legal advice nahi. Poora faisla padhne ke liye original source dekhiye. Published on cgaindia.com: 2026-10-20.